|
Paper Review Decision Process
Your paper will be judged according to the following criteria:
(1) Novelty of problem
(2) Uniqueness of perspective
(3) Innovativeness of model
(4) Completeness of literature review
(5) Appropriateness of research method
(6) Theoretical contribution
(7) Readability of paper
| |
Second Reviewer's Decision |
| Conclusion |
Accept |
Minor Revisions |
Major Revisions |
Reject |
| First Reviewer's Decision |
Accept |
Accepted for Publication |
Send back for Revision, then Accept |
Send back for Revision, then Reexamine |
* |
| Minor Revisions |
Send back for Revision, then Accept |
Send back for Revision, then Accept |
Send back for Revision, then Reexamine |
* |
| Major Revisions |
Send back for Revision, then Reexamine |
Send back for Revision, then Reexamine |
Send back for Revision, then Reexamine |
Reject |
| Reject |
* |
* |
Reject |
Reject |
* In this case, the editor in chief or executive editor will
make a decision (i.e., reject, seek the third reviewer's opinion, or ask for major revisions) by evaluating the scores and commands from the two reviewers.
|